TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision M4800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision M4800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FVDR2
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 12:25
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 128
55% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 374
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 56.5%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Dell(1028 05CC) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 1.64%
 Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SB2M512G 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 225 302 322 329 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 287
Write 284
Mixed 168
SusWrite 307
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 124
131% 218 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 66.4%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G HP16D3LS1KBG/4G Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision M4800 Builds (Compare 2,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4800

CPU
Core i7-4810MQIntel  $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples855x
Core i7-4800MQIntel  $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples488x
Core i7-4910MQIntel  $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples299x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples1,362x
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples641x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples385x
SSD
hynix SH920 2.5 256GBSKBench 73%, 2,404 samples50x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples46x
LMT-256L9M-11 MSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 78%, 2,178 samples43x
RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples169x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples93x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples81x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback