Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 34.2 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 113 37% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 227 29% 221 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(F000 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 C100 256GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0918A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 232 231 67 16 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 318 Write 314 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 124 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 0.4 17% 6.37 MB/s	DQ Read 81.1 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 0.4 13% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 12.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.6"	1280 720	ASM1560 ASM-156FC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x