Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1139
102% 863 Pts
64-Core 2,041
126% 2,041 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 182
Parallax 177
134% 175 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 174
Splatting 121
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
551GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 384 369 340 356 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 399
Mixed 382
SusWrite 364
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 42.6
142% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 185
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
88GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 316 233 229 230 224 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 394
Write 405
Mixed 346
SusWrite 272
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 33.9
118% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 110 68 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 2.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 101
20% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
18% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
607GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 35.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 37.3
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Samsung STORY Station 2TB
587GB free, PID 5f07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 35.2
Mixed 26
33% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 23%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 177 180 180 180 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 188
Write 193
Mixed 123
SusWrite 181
231% 171 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 33.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 1R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 20% 35 279 195 144 27" 2560 1440 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback