Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 16:35
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 77.5 1-Core 151 2-Core 294 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,080 99% 830 Pts	64-Core 1950 121% 1950 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.8% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 59.8 49% 59.8 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 59.8 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 551GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 377 379 385 332 360 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 395 Mixed 388 SusWrite 369 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 46.6 144% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 184 143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 88GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 230 225 231 222 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 419 Write 416 Mixed 348 SusWrite 230 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 33.7 118% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 99%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$169 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 92 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 65.3 Write 64.8 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 91.4 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 607GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 34 Write 27.7 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 20.5 38% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 22%
Samsung STORY Station 2TB 305 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 587GB free, PID 5f07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 14.7 Write 35.5 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 21.6 40% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 23%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 177 179 181 179 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 184 Write 192 Mixed 117 SusWrite 181 228% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB 5,437 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 32.8 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 26.4 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
2%	3%	69	107	5	60	27"	2560 1440	MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,150x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,720x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	916x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	884x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	701x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	600x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	305x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	277x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,461

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16