Asrock Z390 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 269
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 817
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.2
27% 33.2 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 491 580 532 581 571 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,272
Write 1,971
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 583
346% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 52.2
206% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,145
868% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 242%
Great: 340%
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB
602GB free
Firmware: 42AAT7GD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 1597 1041 247 708 1433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,752
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 1,081
290% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 31
110% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 299
230% 318 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 164%
Great: 382%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
602GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 132 132 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 108
Write 89.4
Mixed 37
SusWrite 128
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
980GB free
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 126 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 126
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/4G M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 25.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 4R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 16% 64 310 226 60 27" 1366 768 HKC0000 I27LMH1
History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 30: 4R 2G 4B
Typical Z390 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Pro4 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback