Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 15:07
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 948 85% 715 Pts	64-Core 1292 80% 1292 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% EVGA(3842 1261) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.5% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 92 Parallax 83.5 63% 84.2 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 91.6 Splatting 77.1 74% 91.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 81%
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Lighting 95.8 Reflection 92.4 Parallax 89.5 78% 92.6 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 84.2 Splatting 76.5 76% 95.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 523GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 423 450 327 452 451 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 453 Mixed 356 SusWrite 405 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 45.9 160% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 293 238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AHD19S8G26S 2x8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 29.8 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 28 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 8R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	58%	26	339	277	165	18.7"	1920 1080	HWP290B Compaq S1922

History: Score 16: 1R 2G 5B | Score 61: 8R 7G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	818x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	749x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	773x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	414x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	347x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	197x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16