QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 45
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 143
47% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 510
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 52.4
Parallax 46.1
41% 49.7 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 44
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 103GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1378
Write 1,075
Mixed 1,101
263% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 15.3
50% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 70.4
DQ Mixed 70.7
53% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 36.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.3
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 72 27" 1280 720 SAM0E10 S27HG5x
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback