Medion Akoya P5396 H/B784

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion Akoya P5396 H/B784 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 61.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 212 70% 129 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 390 49% 370 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3203) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 42.9 Parallax 39.3 33% 40.9 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 34.5 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 39 27 21 22 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 425 Write 71.5 Mixed 105 SusWrite 35.5 34% 159 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 18.3 72% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 23.3 DQ Mixed 43.4 45% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 688GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 162 157 157 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 143 Mixed 111 SusWrite 159 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 819 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 0R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	33%	18	296	203	60	24"	1920 1080	BNQ78A5 BenQ GL2450

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5396 H/B784 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Medion Akoya P5396 H/B784

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 28%, 1,807 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 819 samples	1x
16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1311 M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 16GBMicronBench 48%, 5 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $378

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16