Medion MD34190/2586

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34190/2586  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B550A4-EM
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 627
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 64
Parallax 86.2
51% 71 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 46.9
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 712
Write 837
Mixed 390
144% 646 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 53.2
193% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 312
290% 457 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
470GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 155 147 157 148 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 131
Write 152
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 150
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 75 31.5" 1280 720 PHLC20E PHL 325E1
Typical MD34190/2586 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Medion MD34190/2586

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback