Lenovo 80H1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80H1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Edge 15
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140928
Uptime21.7 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 00:54
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 122
61% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.9
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 90 72 65 69 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 407
Write 330
Mixed 269
SusWrite 88.5
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 10.7
60% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 5.4
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 35
32% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.6" 1280 720 LGD044F
Typical 80H1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80H1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback