Biostar N68S3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar N68S3+  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100826
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 19:28
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 79.9
43% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 78
8-Core 83.5
11% 80.8 Pts
64-Core 84.8
5% 84.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 15.6
13% 19.3 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 15.6
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 45 52 54 48 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 80
Write 73.5
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 47.9
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 52%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
96GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 21.8
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 21.8
30% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5673GB0-CH9 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 19% 47 92 6 60 26" 1360 768 BOE0010
Typical N68S3+ Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback