Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H370HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 19:07
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 278 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 774 80% 644 Pts	64-Core 838 52% 838 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.3% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 50.4 47% 55.7 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 47.7 39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB 42,173 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 276 277 278 278 278 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,452 Write 1,162 Mixed 1,012 SusWrite 300 219% 981 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 73 246% 85.6 MB/s	DQ Read 802 DQ Write 708 DQ Mixed 255 328% 588 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 236%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 24GB free Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 151 147 143 141 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 432 Write 255 Mixed 303 SusWrite 162 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 16.3 75% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 35.2 46% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 125GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 152 153 153 153 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 148 Write 144 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 150 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 112GB free Firmware: AX1P5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 27 28 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 61.4 Write 61.6 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 25.9 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 62%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 249GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 68GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 13 11 9.1 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 77.4 Write 72.3 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 11.1 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 37%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB 2,275 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 110GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 54.4 Write 55.5 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 57.9 77% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.3 152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23.8 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	BNQ78E6 BenQ GW2780

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	276x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	210x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	127x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $601

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16