MSI 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7893
MotherboardMSI 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 21:08
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 54.2
35% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 169
16% 135 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1619 MHz, MLim: 1880 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 69.9
54% 66.9 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 55.2
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 186 279 118 170 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 438
Write 383
Mixed 390
SusWrite 225
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 21.9
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 148
109% 146 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
228GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 157 234 248 135 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 433
Write 389
Mixed 306
SusWrite 191
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 20.5
69% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 29.4
28% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
575GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 77
Write 54.6
Mixed 29
SusWrite 76.4
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
574GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 120 151 153 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 163
Write 134
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 146
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
695GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 128 164 166 167 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 162
Mixed 102
SusWrite 157
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
ASMT 2115 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 108 141 144 144 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 148
Write 141
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 135
169% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
573GB free, PID ab2d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 110 113 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 108
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 107
122% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1600 CL9 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 14.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 30 27.9" 1280 720 PHL08D7 Philips 288P6
Typical 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893) Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback