PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111011 |
Uptime | 19.3 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '21 at 15:22 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | ISR-User |
Background CPU | 68% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
PNY(196E 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 29 39 45 39 43 MB/s
|
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
549GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 28 41 42 39 43 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
70GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 86 90 90 90 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
|||
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB
27GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
14.6%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM0B67 S27D390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 28x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $250 |