Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	7.84GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.84GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 93.3 41% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 588 45% 401 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Microsoft RemoteFX Graphics Device - WDDM 126 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: rdvgumd64.dll Ver. 10.0.15063.0 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 16.2 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 33.5 13% 24 fps	MRender 43.2 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 50.3 40% 48.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 387GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 506 Write 480 Mixed 483 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 12.8 59% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.7 DQ Write 24.7 DQ Mixed 10.1 11% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7GB 8,824 User benchmarks, average bench 24% null MHz 2048, 5976 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.8 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325