Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 01:12
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 112 56% 87 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 334 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 38 33% 36.5 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 36.4 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1131 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 538 (64) Unknown 100 100 1319792 (65) Unknown 100 100 177312 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 27 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 778 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 651 (B7) Unknown 99 99 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 171799478305 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 4 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2423 (EA) Unknown 100 100 914 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1902 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3300 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 4	55% Above average	Read 473 Write 193 Mixed 225 65% 297 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 9.05 66% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 40.5 DQ Mixed 26.7 44% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 747GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 8904 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3647 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11706194 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4070 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2701 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 538902559 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 142 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4067 (C2) HDA temperature 31 48 47244640287 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 15 5 8904 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -22969485094015 (F1) Unknown 100 253 399461516 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2800087109	47.1% Average	Read 80.9 Write 83.5 Mixed 68.5 58% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.33 68% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 387GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 9 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 4467 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 966 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1713 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 38 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 878 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 18 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 46 240518955041 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3921 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 38 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 43394	45.9% Average	Read 80 Write 79.7 Mixed 77.6 60% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.23 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 192GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2241 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3182 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3236 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2128 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3078 (C2) HDA temperature 110 95 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 12 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 91 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.25 94% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 110GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 138 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3488 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7080 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3455 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3289 (C2) HDA temperature 108 94 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 91 91 6917 (F1) Unknown 200 200 56810477777 (F2) Unknown 200 200 63760460143	52% Above average	Read 89.8 Write 91.5 Mixed 75.4 64% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.28 75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 18.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16