Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 09:00
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 241
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 912
82% 689 Pts
64-Core 2,422
150% 2,422 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Asus(1043 87C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 304
Reflection 282
Parallax 336
247% 307 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 253
Splatting 183
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 206%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1432 1429 1724 1643 1647 1640 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,670
Write 1,772
Mixed 970
SusWrite 1,586
389% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 69.6
247% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 847
641% 864 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 319%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
226GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2063 2069 2000 1972 1970 1942 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,659
Write 1,988
Mixed 1004
SusWrite 2,003
427% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 72
248% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 877
672% 911 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 347%
Great: 353%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 140 138 137 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 143
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 139
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 134 134 139 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 122
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 135
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 87%
Apple HD D TOSHIBA MK5065 500GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.9
Write 71.9
Mixed 17.7
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
207% Outstanding
MC Read 84
MC Write 87.6
MC Mixed 78.1
238% 83.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 32
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 207%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 48.9" 1280 720 AUS49A1 ASUS XG49V
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback