Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '17 at 00:24
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 93.6
48% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 235
26% 207 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 66.1
60% 71.8 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 70
Splatting 72.3
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 484
Write 381
Mixed 394
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 27.8
106% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 18.7
33% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
384GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 102
Mixed 81.7
70% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
13GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31
Write 7.85
Mixed 10.1
16% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.62
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.94
101% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2000 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback