HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1984
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141111
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5550M APU-$80 3,681 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 42.3 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 63.9 27% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 88.2 8-Core 77.7 11% 82.9 Pts	64-Core 80.9 5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G 2,990 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1984) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4.4 2% 3.67 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 159 170 170 163 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 194 Write 168 Mixed 165 SusWrite 161 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 9.1 37% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 23.6 45% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.8 Write 1.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.6 6% 6 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JSF51264HZ-1G1D1 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 5.4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	155x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	123x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	103x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	275x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	159x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	146x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	46x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	44x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 19,744 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16