Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 164
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 657
60% 503 Pts
64-Core 2,516
156% 2,516 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SGNH1TB 1TB
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0821D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 219 218 221 201 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 239
Write 222
Mixed 194
SusWrite 216
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.7
98% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 151
121% 169 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 85%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 675 672 671 680 677 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Seagate STE60005 CLAR600 600GB
1TB free
Firmware: ES0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 107 107 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 110%
Ibm-ssg S5QF300 300GB
559GB free
Firmware: A01E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 376 380 376 380 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 74% Great: 110%
Seagate STE60005 CLAR600 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: ES0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 196
Write 76.3
Mixed 88
SusWrite 76.5
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
242% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 110%
Seagate STE30065 CLAR300 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: ES10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 186
Write 75.4
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 75.7
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
229% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
419GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 115 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 113
Write 132
Mixed 61
SusWrite 114
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.8
241% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CMB-YF8 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback