Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory118.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 20:34
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 37
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 105
36% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 418
37% 314 Pts
64-Core 1,952
121% 1,952 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SGNH1TB 1TB
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0821D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 153 203 210 210 213 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.1% Above average
Read 245
Write 228
Mixed 209
SusWrite 200
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 27.3
90% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 152
122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 424 642 675 677 676 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Seagate STE30065 CLAR300 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: ES10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 65 74 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 187
Write 74.8
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 73.8
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
229% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 82%
Ibm-ssg S5QF300 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: A01E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 66 75 77 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
Read 183
Write 73.2
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 74.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
249% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
419GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 107 120 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 112
Write 131
Mixed 66
SusWrite 112
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
239% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CMB-YF8 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback