HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 06:44
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 193
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 434
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3396) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2
3% 2.67 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 81 126 103 62 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 366
Write 302
Mixed 189
SusWrite 86.7
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 14.1
55% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 37.8
42% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$83
434GB free
Firmware: 3.AJJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 58.2
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 58
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 2R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 9% 76 24 19 60 21.5" 1920 1080 DELA0D8 DELL P2217H
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback