Shuttle SX58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemShuttle SX58  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle SX58
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 01:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 154
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 388
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.5 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.6
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 84 87 88 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 82.9
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 49GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 ACR0074 H243H
Typical SX58 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Shuttle SX58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback