Shuttle SX58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemShuttle SX58  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle SX58
Memory13.9 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 148
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 372
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.9
12% 13 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 144 136 139 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Above average
Read 180
Write 154
Mixed 158
SusWrite 141
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 29
101% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 89
DQ Mixed 38.8
36% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
182GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 70 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 61.1
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 70.1
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 49GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX58 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Shuttle SX58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback