MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 10:04
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 746
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AAR240GS082820030 240GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 51 18 54 85 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
Read 434
Write 369
Mixed 329
SusWrite 66.8
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 28
131% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 41.3
82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
758GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 163 164 162 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 163
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU881-26N1900 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback