TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7233AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemIBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7233AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM Node1 Processor Card
Memory122.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7450
Node 1 CPU 3, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 69.1
31% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 274
24% 206 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 36.8%
 Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 72GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 250GB
231GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 22
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 26
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 15.2%
 Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32x4GB
32 of 32 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 30.2%
 Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback