Intel B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel B75  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 12:26
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 418
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2095 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 98.3
Parallax 83.8
81% 93.9 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 87.6
Splatting 79.3
65% 78.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Veno SCORP SSD 480GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XKR905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 244 104 4.4 146 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 476
Write 388
Mixed 356
SusWrite 84.3
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 89%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
934GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 232 235 233 230 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 240
Write 236
Mixed 219
SusWrite 233
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 31.4
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 194
145% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 105%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 105 112 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 105
Write 112
Mixed 66
SusWrite 110
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 40.3
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 41.1
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 6R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 12% 58 298 244 60 27" 1920 1080 AUS27E4 VX279
Typical B75 Builds (Compare 4,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback