bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel NUC7i5BNB
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 02:48
Run Duration	371 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7260U 2,757 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 89 2-Core 167 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 273 37% 274 Pts	64-Core 244 15% 244 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 7,552 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Intel(8086 2068) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 8.6 Parallax 0.1 8% 6.13 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 10.7 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 83 8.4 15 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 325 Write 218 Mixed 232 SusWrite 45.7 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 25.2 95% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 131 120% 181 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 102%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 54GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 33GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 74 8.1 15 16 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.5% Poor	Read 156 Write 104 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 37.3 22% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 9.3 40% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 19.5 DQ Mixed 17.5 14% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G 9905624-054.A00G 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 48.5 MC Mixed 19.4 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 4R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	38%	24	83	61	60	24"	1920 1080	ACI2494 VE248

History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 39: 4R 6G 1B | Score 31: 3R 5G 1B | Score 31: 4R 3G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,035x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,578x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	939x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,050x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	378x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	298x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16