Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20090226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 42.5 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 40.8 24% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 31.6 8-Core 40.6 5% 36.1 Pts	64-Core 33.4 2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 035C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 4.9 5% 5.7 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.8 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.03E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 40 38 40 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 58 Write 60.8 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 39 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.1 3.5 3.6 3 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 4.3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 3.3 7% 6.97 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.1 6.5 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.2 11% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.5 102% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 33792 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.64% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 38%, 530 samples	6x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 35%, 535 samples	5x
Phenom X3 8600BAMDBench 42%, 388 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 1,215 samples	14x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16