HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory2.6 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20090226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Memory 20.3
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 61.7
22% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 78.2
8-Core 78.6
11% 78.4 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Asus(1043 035C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 5
5% 5.83 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$30
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 48 36 25 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 67.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 40.9
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Read 18
Write 3
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.6
6% 6.58 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.6 7.4 6.6 6.3 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 7.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.8
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.7
116% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 318
13% 318 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq dc5850 Microtower Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $265
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback