Gigabyte GA-770T-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-770T-USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 46
2-Core 92.6
46% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 157
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
XFX(1682 3002) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.4
5% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 2.9
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 64 20 62 55 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 207
Write 204
Mixed 192
SusWrite 72.8
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 9.9
74% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 23.1
26% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-770T-USB3 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-770T-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback