Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 08:55
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 275 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 656 76% 594 Pts	64-Core 838 52% 838 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Lighting 73.6 Reflection 111 Parallax 70 60% 84.9 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 68.2 60% 74.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.U SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 324 227 226 218 235 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 481 Mixed 325 SusWrite 241 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 41.6 156% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 69 124% 244 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 515GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 174 172 173 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 140 Write 134 Mixed 90.4 SusWrite 173 99% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 25.8 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 28.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 56.3 71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	110x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	95x
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	83x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	74x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	42x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	37x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $545

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16