Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory47.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 17:23
Run Duration725 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 138
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 738
72% 591 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 571 568 566 569 573 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1203
Write 1,186
Mixed 892
SusWrite 586
217% 967 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 59.1
228% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 738
624% 909 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 198%
Great: 340%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 595GB
554GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 251 259 259 242 263 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
Read 290
Write 276
Mixed 247
SusWrite 255
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 32.7
118% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 133
123% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 81%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
911GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 435 428 428 432 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 461
Mixed 431
SusWrite 421
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 55.3
190% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1467 1471 1499 1516 1547 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 1,604
Mixed 1,285
SusWrite 1,501
343% 1,526 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 81.2
263% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 396
488% 856 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 291%
Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 456 455 460 464 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 466
Mixed 408
SusWrite 461
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.1
206% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 163 166 168 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 195
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 166
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
92GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 94 99 103 92 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 95
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 95.9
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
53GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 38 37 37 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 138
Write 109
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 34.8
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
154GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 82 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 5R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 26% 65 76 6 144 0" 3840 1080
History: Score 24: 3R 2G 3B | Score 23: 1R 3G 9B | Score 49: 6R 4G 7B | Score 42: 3R 6G 9B | Score 55: 5R 7G 9B | Score 44: 4R 6G 6B | Score 57: 7R 4G 10B | Score 29: 1R 6G 6B | Score 53: 6R 5G 8B | Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 43: 5R 3G 9B
Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback