Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 14:30
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700-$233 71,010 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 147 2-Core 289 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 789 82% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,103 68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Dell(1028 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 18.2 14% 17.7 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.6 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 39,219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 8.6 5% 10.6 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 13.4 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4030) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 50.9 42% 52.6 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 47 Splatting 45.1 41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB 29,078 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 769GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 831 728 603 737 860 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1428 Write 1,471 Mixed 931 SusWrite 784 259% 1,153 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 21.8 159% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 895 DQ Write 870 DQ Mixed 475 468% 747 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 310%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	8.74% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.1 11% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 47% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.74% Great: 9%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB 2,409 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.1 7 8.2 8.6 7.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 21.9 Write 20.4 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 8.1 16% 13 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 7%
WD 1600BMV External 160GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 116GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 33 32 32 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 36.4 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 31.5 42% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB 9,447 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 17.9 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	7%	14	73	5	0	23.8"	1920 1080	AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 138%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 134%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	92x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	70x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	68x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	83x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	33x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	30x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	19x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 85%, 54,117 samples	30x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $828

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16