MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 300
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 935
95% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,202
74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 252
Parallax 492
195% 328 fps
MRender 387
Gravity 199
Splatting 289
237% 292 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 188%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS500GMTE240S 500GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82A7TCUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2402 856 474 2524 515 517 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,380
Write 2,474
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 1,214
435% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 105
365% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 924
688% 899 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 322%
Great: 400%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
245GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 536 536 533 536 535 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1314
Write 794
Mixed 124
SusWrite 570
154% 701 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 39.9
127% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 116
102% 160 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 135%
Great: 277%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 200 199 201 200 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 220
Mixed 98
SusWrite 200
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 203 205 206 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
SP SDXC USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 12.1
21% 19 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 23.8" 1280 720 IVM615C PL2470H
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback