Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 05:04
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 77.6 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 1,032 93% 782 Pts	64-Core 1,497 93% 1,497 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 98.6 Parallax 112 92% 108 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 109 Splatting 83.1 86% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 475GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 269 121 229 119 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,415 Write 1,772 Mixed 1,317 SusWrite 164 262% 1,167 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 64.4 204% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 671 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 17.2 135% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 305%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 114 137 135 138 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 131 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 133 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 130%
Seagate ST8000DM0004-1ZC11G 8TB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 5.5TB free Firmware: DN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 182 206 211 215 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 734GB free Firmware: MEAOAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 65 66 65 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 65.2 Write 61.2 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 64.4 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 6TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 160 175 179 189 180 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x31.5GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 34.3 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 32.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	75	31.5"	1280 720	PHLC20E PHL 325E1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,658x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,277x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,079x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,027

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16