Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FJ
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 08:08
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	37%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 42.6 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 89 32% 55 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 299 29% 239 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230 6,801 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 11AF) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5763 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Lighting 12.5 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 11.7 10% 12.9 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 12.4 10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 46 154 47 50 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 790 Write 626 Mixed 675 SusWrite 104 122% 549 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 25.8 117% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 215 181% 265 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 2,923 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	14	25	5	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	183x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	41x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	149x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	86x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	63x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	13x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	11x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	119x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	19x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16