To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190917
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 187 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 34.4 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 37 21% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 37.2 8-Core 44.2 5% 40.7 Pts	64-Core 43.4 3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 155 171 191 156 148 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.4% Poor	Read 145 Write 35.6 Mixed 174 SusWrite 139 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 4.8 23% 9.3 MB/s	DQ Read 91.4 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 17.2 35% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 93%
Jmicron Generic 120GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 50GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 24 25 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 18.8 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 22.9 15% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.5 526% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/8G 1x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	30	8	4	60	32"	1280 720	GDH0030 TV PHILCO

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	718x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	304x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16