Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160620
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 216
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 406
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2307) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 23.3
20% 24.7 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 17.7
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R021
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 318
Write 404
Mixed 342
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 38.9
138% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 272
202% 265 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
752GB free
Firmware: 033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 374 371 377 379 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 399
Mixed 373
SusWrite 376
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.1
173% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 269
217% 307 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
248GB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 39
Write 37.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 39.3
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 8R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 25% 36 63 48 60 22" 1680 1050 MAX089F o.disp2.1_22W
History: Score 28: 5R 0G 3B | Score 43: 8R 1G 0B
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback