Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 155
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 397
43% 339 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 14.7 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.8
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 206 147 148 113 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 403
Write 437
Mixed 373
SusWrite 188
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 31.6
110% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 305
221% 284 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 19.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 8R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 22% 74 257 175 60 15.5" 1920 1080 LGD0590
History: Score 8: 0R 2G 2B | Score 14: 2R 0G 4B | Score 44: 6R 2G 8B | Score 50: 8R 1G 7B
Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback