Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,254
112% 946 Pts
64-Core 2,336
145% 2,336 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 119
Parallax 137
111% 131 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 436 436 422 381 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 436
Mixed 427
SusWrite 398
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 50.8
174% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
620GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1550 846 848 849 850 850 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,873
Mixed 1,483
SusWrite 965
333% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 84.2
304% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,303
978% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 274%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
464GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 463 463 443 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 457
Mixed 452
SusWrite 432
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 56.6
186% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$82
754GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 444 445 427 395 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 416
Mixed 401
SusWrite 426
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 50.4
168% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 184
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
454GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 176 175 176 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 94.2
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 175
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
163% Outstanding
MC Read 106
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 43.3
181% 63.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 41.9
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 163%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 43S525
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback