Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 22:41
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
POV(1ACC 068A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 51.9
35% 44.9 fps
MRender 51.5
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 37
37% 46 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 472
Write 326
Mixed 318
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 11.8
60% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 38.3
64% 131 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 140
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 86.6
Mixed 85
111% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.22
55% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
513GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 88.1
Write 84.3
Mixed 72.2
103% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 61%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 124GB
59GB free, PID fa64
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 187
Write 135
Mixed 7.5
118% 110 MB/s
4K Read 5.14
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.001
20% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
5GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 11
Mixed 16
22% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.98
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.13
40% 3.06 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 1319 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback