Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 06:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 766
74% 611 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 137
Parallax 89.4
82% 109 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 76.7
67% 82.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 49 36 97 127 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 455
Write 366
Mixed 297
SusWrite 117
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 19.2
66% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 43.8
45% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
54GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 57 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 71.4
Mixed 50
SusWrite 57.2
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.6
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 102%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback