Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 01:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 788
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 131
Parallax 82.7
79% 104 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 74.2
62% 75 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 128 65 156 157 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 455
Write 383
Mixed 330
SusWrite 151
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 19.4
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 44.5
48% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
76GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 74 75 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 95.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 74.2
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 32.4
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback