Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 05:51
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 212 68% 126 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 434 45% 364 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 83.2 Reflection 120 Parallax 72.7 68% 91.9 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 81.6 Splatting 73.8 68% 84.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 26.3 16% 19.6 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 13.1 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 69 54 53 56 53 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,370 Write 888 Mixed 834 SusWrite 107 177% 800 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 62.8 211% 74.3 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 677 DQ Mixed 340 305% 449 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.2% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 26.6 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 22.8 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	27"	1280 720	DELF115 DELL SE2719HR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	53x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	47x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	12x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	41x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	29x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16