Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 23:45
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 169
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 446
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 36.4
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 26.3
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 121 63 209 18 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 135
Write 16.2
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 137
18% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 7.6
50% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 67.2
52% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
217GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 91.2
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 87.5
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 7R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 36% 42 253 202 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D1A S22F350
History:
Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback