Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	8.94% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '21 at 02:58
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 39.6 1-Core 7 2-Core 19.4 17% 22 Pts	4-Core 26.2 8-Core 40.9 4% 33.6 Pts	64-Core 26.4 2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.1% Poor	Lighting 24.6 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 32.7 20% 29.8 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 25.5 26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3500102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 64 67 12 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.94% Terrible	Read 85.1 Write 27.9 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 30 9% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 2.5 12% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 292GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 84 96 91 99 106 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 77.7 Write 82.1 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 95.7 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 4,667 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 8.9 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	30x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	29x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	20x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16