Lenovo 90DF00CEMW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90DF00CEMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 191
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 500
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 3490) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 60.2
52% 63.9 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 60
50% 60.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 442
Mixed 293
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 51.2
178% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 341
262% 356 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
277GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 179 178 179 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 132
Write 104
Mixed 74
SusWrite 178
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 0467 RMUA5090KB78HAF2133 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 20
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 21.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 6% 87 101 1 60 23" 1920 1080 AUS23CC VZ239
History:
Typical 90DF00CEMW Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 90DF00CEMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback