Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-610
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 14:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 638
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 40
Parallax 45
33% 41.9 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 35.4
37% 47.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 162 159 143 152 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 238
Mixed 302
SusWrite 159
90% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 30.2
118% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 285
233% 337 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 206%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 40 39 40 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback