Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4850HQ 818 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 184 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 508 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Apple(106B 0130) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 10.5 7% 9.9 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 9.3 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Apple SM0512F 500GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM2JA1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 58 62 62 68 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
APPLE SD Card Reader 250GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 90GB free, PID 8406 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 51 50 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 84.7 Write 50.8 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 49.4 82% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 4.9 350% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70.4% Very good	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 20.1 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	68x

SSD
SM0512F 500GBAppleBench 83%, 287 samples	33x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	4x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	2x

RAM
0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GBUnknownBench 63%, 311 samples	37x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
0x 2x8GBUnknownBench 66%, 83 samples	14x